Författare Ämne: Våldtäkt  (läst 2822 gånger)

Gäst

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Antal inlägg: 1
  • Karma: 0
    • Visa profil
Våldtäkt
« skrivet: 30 oktober 2004, 15:56:17 PM »
Läsmaterial:

http://www.menweb.org/throop/falsereport/kanin.html

http://www.menweb.org/throop/falsereport/adult.html


"Every year since 1989, in about 25 percent of the
sexual assault cases referred to the FBI where
results could be obtained (primarily by State and
local law enforcement), the primary suspect has
been excluded by forensic DNA testing.
Specifically, FBI officials report that out of
roughly 10,000 sexual assault cases since 1989,
about 2,000 tests have been inconclusive (usually
insufficient high molecular weight DNA to do
testing), about 2,000 tests have excluded the
primary suspect, and about 6,000 have "matched" or
included the primary suspect.1 The fact that these
percentages have remained constant for 7 years, and
that the National Institute of Justice's informal
survey of private laboratories reveals a strikingly
similar 26-percent exclusion rate, strongly
suggests that postarrest and postconviction DNA
exonerations are tied to some strong, underlying
systemic problems that generate erroneous
accusations and convictions."      

 "It is, of course, possible that some of the FBI's
sexual assault exclusions have included false
negatives. False negatives could occur, for
example, because of (1) laboratory error; (2)
situations where the victim of the assault conceals
the existence of a consensual sexual partner within
48 hours of the incident and the accused suspect
did not ejaculate (if the suspect ejaculated, the
DNA should be identified along with the undisclosed
sexual partner); or (3) multiple assailant sexual
assault cases where none of the apprehended
suspects ejaculated (the FBI counts the exclusion
of all multiple suspects in a case as just one
exclusion). Nonetheless, even with these caveats,
it is still plain that forensic DNA testing is
prospectively exonerating a substantial number of
innocent individuals who would have otherwise stood
trial, frequently facing the difficult task of
refuting mistaken eyewitness identification by a
truthful crime victim who would rightly deserve
juror sympathy."

http://www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles/dnaevid.txt


http://www.antifeminist.nu/message.php?MessageID=730

susanna svensson

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Antal inlägg: 280
  • Karma: 0
    • Visa profil
Våldtäkt
« Svar #1 skrivet: 30 oktober 2004, 17:36:37 PM »
Det förekommer tyvärr kvinnor som använder våldtäktsvapnet som en form av misshandel mot män. Dessa kvinnor som falsanmäler borde kritiseras hårdare av feminismen eftersom att varje avslöjade falsanmälare gör det svårare för verkliga våldtäktsoffer att bli trodda.